Ike Seamans
Miami Herald
June 13, 2003
Before last week’s summit, Arab as well as radical-right publications in the
United States launched a bruising blitz condemning Israel as an
untrustworthy ally and an unfit partner for peace.
Numerous timeworn allegations of its duplicity were cited, including the
assault on the USS Liberty, which occurred 36 years ago this week — on June
8, 1967. During the Six Day War, the spy ship was operating in international
waters near the Sinai Peninsula. Without warning, Israeli jets and torpedo
boats attacked the lightly armed vessel. Thirty-four Americans were killed,
171 wounded. The fighter planes’ recently declassified communications
transcripts suggest that there was considerable uncertainty about the
Liberty’s identity. Several U.S. and Israeli inquiries have declared the
tragedy a case of friendly fire.
Had the episode happened any place else, it would have eventually faded as
just another unfortunate tragedy in the fog of war. However, in true Middle
Eastern fashion, the haze thickened, deeply embedded hatreds and ancient
grudges intensified in the rancorous region as well as in the United States.
For almost four decades, conspiracy theories have mushroomed, bolstered by
conflicting testimony, contested accounts, ‘’new evidence'’ that pops up
with surprising regularity and prejudicial attitudes that spin the imbroglio
like a top. While some seek the truth, others exploit the Liberty affair in
an attempt to destroy the U.S.-Israel relationship.
Two weeks ago The Palestine Chronicle claimed, ‘’Israel got away with the
slaughter of heroes, but Americans are finally stirring from their deep
sleep and don’t give a hoot for a phony relationship with Zionist Israel,
which demeans America and its Christian foundation.'’ Racist David Duke
calls it, “an act of terrorism by Israel led by the world’s leading war
criminal, Ariel Sharon.'’
ATTACK WASN’T PLANNED
In a letter to President Bush demanding a congressional investigation (there
has never been one), the USS Liberty Veterans Association charges, ‘’Our
so-called ally’s despicable act was a sneak attack on America.'’ When
retired U.S. Navy officer Keith Taylor wrote not long ago in a San Diego
newspaper that the attack was not planned, he received hate mail branding
him, ‘’Israel’s lackey, a traitor for believing Zionist Jews.'’ In an
e-mail, Christopher Mitchell, producer of a BBC documentary last year about
the dispute, told me, “The United States and Israel have colluded in a
cover-up for 36 years, but this story won’t die because the attack was
deliberate.'’
In contrast, Six Days of War author Michael B. Oren maintains, ‘’There’s no
evidence whatsoever it was anything but accidental.'’ After 14 years of
extensive research in several countries, Miami federal bankruptcy Judge A.
Jay Cristol also concludes that the attack wasn’t premeditated. His 2002
book, The Liberty Incident, promptly ignited a new vindictive firestorm, the
ship’s official website labeling him as ‘’our severest critic.'’ The judge
has filed a federal lawsuit to obtain classified data from the National
Security Agency, which he believes will sustain his argument. ‘I have
sympathy for the survivors and victims’ families, but they are used and
abused by those who have their own agendas,'’ he said last week. “Those who
are anti-Israel and anti-Semitic jump on the bandwagon because this is one
of the few places to drive a wedge between us and Israel.'’
In 1905 when he opined, ‘’Those who cannot remember the past are condemned
to repeat it,'’ Spanish philosopher George Santayana couldn’t have been
thinking about the truculent Middle East. There, ceaseless controversies
from the past are not only remembered, they’re also kept alive with a
vengeance.
This entry was posted
on Sunday, June 15th, 2003 and is filed under opinion.